Arc Forumnew | comments | leaders | submit | projectileboy's commentslogin
4 points by projectileboy 5778 days ago | link | parent | on: New Features

Could you please update the Arc tutorial to include this stuff, as well as other syntactic features? (For example, the tutorial doesn't have an example of the dot operator.) Nothing crazy, just one line REPL dumps of each feature in action would be very helpful.

-----

9 points by pg 5778 days ago | link

That's actually one of the things I'm working on next.

-----

2 points by projectileboy 5778 days ago | link

Thanks!

-----


It's my first time through The Little Schemer, and I've been using Arc instead of Scheme because... well, because it's just so pretty. I could post my files thus far on a wiki if anyone would care... I'm currently on Chapter 8.

-----

1 point by justgord 5878 days ago | link

Please do share.

Enjoyed your ppt slide talk on Arc posted elsewhere on this forum. [ converted to text - let me know if you want that]

They'd both be helpful on a Wiki.

gord.

-----

2 points by anarcer 5888 days ago | link

Great! TIA

-----

0 points by markokocic 5888 days ago | link

Don't do it.

-----

2 points by projectileboy 5893 days ago | link | parent | on: Source table

Are you thinking to have at runtime or at edit-time? I ask because my IntelliJ plugin for Arc does this - you just hit cmd-shift-I (on a Mac, at any rate), and a little window pops up with the source code for whatever the cursor is on. Is this what you mean...?

-----

4 points by shader 5893 days ago | link

I was thinking at runtime, I.e. in the repl or available via the online help op. It would add greatly to the automatic documentation that currently exists.

-----

4 points by projectileboy 5913 days ago | link | parent | on: Arc presentation

Hey, I actually did a presentation on Arc for a weekend gathering in Minneapolis. It may or may not present things the way you're thinking, but you're welcome to lift whatever you'd like, if it would be helpful:

http://www.bitbakery.com/The_Arc_Programming_Language.ppt

It starts by just showing the same nuts and bolts stuff as PG's Arc tutorial, but then I elaborated on creating macros for creating objects and classes, which I thought would resonate with the target audience.

(Forgive the weird formatting; it's a Powerpoint export from Google Presentations.)

-----

2 points by conanite 5913 days ago | link

Thanks, this is an awesome presentation. I will definitely be stealing liberally from it if I do this.

(btw I uploaded back into google, I don't have ppt installed, it looks fine)

-----

1 point by drcode 5912 days ago | link

Do you live in MN? (I'm visiting there beginning of March...)

-----

1 point by projectileboy 5910 days ago | link

Yeah! See my profile for more info.

-----

1 point by justgord 5878 days ago | link

Ive been using arc for a while, but some things were made clearer by this presentation.

Any chance you'll put it up on a blog/website? [so it would come up when googled]

One reason I ask, is I noticed my Linux box go CPU bound when loading that ppt in OO.org [hardly your fault I know]

-----


LOL... That's awesome!

Hey, have fun with the little person; I'm on number three, and I have a (mostly) great time. I wish I had some excellent parenting advice to give...

-----


Gee, man, it was just a friendly question. I don't think any reasonable people here actually expect Paul to prioritize hacking over his wife and baby.

Your comment sounds a lot like what I'd expect on comp.lang.lisp. I get what you were trying to express, but please tone it down a little.

-----

3 points by lboard 5921 days ago | link

i misunderstood, Sorry!

-----

1 point by projectileboy 5951 days ago | link | parent | on: My favorite debug print macro

Thanks for this! Very handy.

-----

8 points by projectileboy 6016 days ago | link | parent | on: Where are we going?

This is just one guy's opinion, and I'm hardly a 133t Lisp hax0r. But I'm not a part of this community to ride the next big wave. I'm here because I'm tired of the next big waves, because they almost always suck. I'm here because I want to be able to latch on to something that actually provides me with some small measure of joy, and that has a chance of having some real, lasting impact.

-----


I second the implicit gensyms; I thought the syntax forit was decent.

-----

1 point by projectileboy 6039 days ago | link | parent | on: Macro question

Thanks to you and to cchooper for the help. I hadn't thought to run against Anarki.

-----

More