Thanks for the feedback, both here and on the bug in the bitbucket tracker.
I'm not sure of my feelings on changing all the asserts to be just one. On one hand, it is simpler to have just the one command. On the other, it seems like a much more complicated interface, as you would never guess how to use it from, for example, the method signature. assert-t, assert-same et. al. seem like a lower conceptual load.
It reminds me of the arguments over CL's loop macro -- who knows all of it? I can never remember how to do much of what I want. Of course, this is much simpler than loop. Maybe I'll implement it and see how it feels.
